full-disclosure - Moderated?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Sep  9 11:11:01 2005
From: venom at gen-x.co.nz (VeNoMouS)
Subject: Moderated?

Nah I'm sorry,  But I gotta agree with Enrico, this list has way to many 
kids on it now, fuck i dont even bother opening my full-disclosure folder 
half the time now cause i know its full of crap. some one does needa pull 
finger and do some cleaning in reguards to moderation.

If it keeps going the way it does, The people who post valid shit will just 
walk.

Is this a security mailing list or a teen irc channel?

ps: flame all you want, sif i care, i know there will be a couple of you 
fucktards who will take this to much to heart and abuse me a little.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rachael Treu Gomes" <rara@...igo.com>
To: "Enrico Kern" <phantom@....org>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Moderated?

If you've been lurking here for years, you should also
be able to remember 2 things...

1.  This list is is based on unmoderated communications.
2.  This list is notorious for the colorful belligerence
and of its posters and rampant barking of wild animals.

Where have you been?  ;)

Searching the archives for the many previous suggestions
that this list be moderated or complaints that its
subscribers behave like cranky monkeys will yield
multiple reasons for why things remain the same...

--ra

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:35:08PM +0200, Enrico Kern said something to the 
effect of:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> i read this list now for a few years and a while ago it was (ok is still
> is...) a good information source for vulnerabilities and other security
> relevant informations.
>
> But since a while it seems like kids do a good job on taking over this
> list. Hello? there is no need to fight each other her, nor todo useless
> posts (AND REPLYS TO STUPID POSTS). Whats up with a few guys here?
>
> Maybe its no bad idea to get some dedicated guys to sort this bullshit out
> here. Just a suggestion.
>
> Greetings
>
> Enrico Kern
>
> - ------------------->
> "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build
> bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce
> bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." (Rich Cook)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDIHZPRBvleJUVuB8RArLrAKCBT6PYZ3VRaLi1I9W4WELVE1SjjgCglr/J
> LGHato8nOJVSR2F08UOHpns=
> =98bI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

-- 
rachael treu gomes                            rara@...igo.com
               ..quis custodiet ipsos custodes?..
(this email has been brought to you by the letters 'v' and 'i'.)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/