[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6450e99d050919052666661a19@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon Sep 19 13:27:00 2005
From: ivanhec at gmail.com (Ivan .)
Subject: OSS means slower patches
sarcastically speaking
On 9/19/05, Michael Silk <michaelslists@...il.com> wrote:
> On 9/19/05, Ivan . <ivanhec@...il.com> wrote:
> > An interesting perspective?
>
> Nope.
>
>
> > http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,16650762%5E15306%5E%5Enbv%5E,00.html
> >
> > Symantec Australia managing director David Sykes said the increasing
> > popularity of open source software, such as the Mozilla Foundation's
> > Firefox browser, could be part of the reason for the increase in the
> > gap between vulnerability and patch, with the open source development
> > model itself part of the problem. "It is relying on the goodwill and
> > best efforts of many people, and that doesn't have the same commercial
> > imperative," he said. "I'm sure that is part of what is causing the
> > blow-out in the patch window."
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists