[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <814b9d505092709531a290ba6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue Sep 27 17:53:25 2005
From: str0ke at milw0rm.com (str0ke)
Subject: Third issue of the Zone-H Comics
It doesn't encourage defacements? Come on now its a defacement
archive, ofcourse it encourages defacements. (Nobody makes me bleed
my own blood, nobody)
I think I finally agree with n3td3v this time on multiple comments
minus the terrorist + sucks + other junk) it is a site dedicated to
defacers who can get the most defacements.)
But thats zone-h's cup of tea not mine, not dogging it just stating
the facts :) If we were to say zone-h sucks then we would also state
that attrition does since they did the exact thing. (which attrition
doesn't suck).
/str0ke
On 9/27/05, Richard Horsman <richardh@...-1.com> wrote:
> n3td3v,
>
> I would compare zone-h more to a newspaper than a terrorists site.
> Newspapers report what is happening in the world whether it's good news
> or bad news. Zone-h brings news about defacements and other security
> related issues, it does not encourage defacements.
>
> Richh
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v
> Sent: 27 September 2005 17:10
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Third issue of the Zone-H Comics
>
> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed your site and it sucks.
>
> Looks like you're trying to encourage the activity of webpage
> defacement and bringing celebrity status to those who can deface/
> submit the most defacements.
>
> You make it look legal by saying the site is useful for research, but
> really, we all know it encourages the malicious kids who submit to the
> site. I don't know why the security services in the U.S haven't closed
> you down.
>
> Your site is in comparison to asking terrorist bombers to post suicide
> bombing videos to a website and asking you to look at it. The only
> difference here is, Zone-H is about cyber terrorism, rather than
> terrorism in the real world.
>
> Do the U.S security services take cyber terrorism as seriously as real
> world terrorism? And if they do, Why is Zone-H still online?
>
> A journalist should ask that question at Bush's next news conference.
>
> Also:
> Are Zone-H admins about to expand the website to allow for suicide
> bombing video's, or is that different from the cyber terrorism that
> your site currently supports. And if you don't support cyber
> terrorism, then why is Zone-H online and why are you an admin of
> Zone-H.org
>
> Thats all for now,
>
> Thanks,
> n3td3v
>
>
> On 9/27/05, Gerardo 'Astharot' Di Giacomo <astharot@...e-h.org> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > http://www.zone-h.org
> > Gerardo 'Astharot' Di Giacomo - Zone-H Admin
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
> NEW: Sec-1 Hacking Training - Learn to breach network security to further your knowledge and protect your network http://www.sec-1.com/applied_hacking_course.html
> ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists