lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue Sep 27 18:53:17 2005
From: andre.ludwig at gmail.com (Andre Ludwig)
Subject: Third issue of the Zone-H Comics

Its because baby Jesus, the green midget, and the robot warriors from
the planet theton all wont let the evil borg (symantec) buy out
zone-h.  Something to do with the second rising of the martian god
nebulionias in the 14th phase of recognition. Don't know much more
then that about the deal as my contacts on the inside have all been re
programmed or destroyed.

And last i checked Zone-h didn't report on anything near as
interesting as isc or other more "attack monitoring" services/groups.

Like i said let the kiddies have their little corner of the
playground.  It keeps all the lower rungs of the fed world busy.  Look
i don't disagree with you when you boil it down.. I just see an added
layer of value (or two or three) of having such a central location for
the tards to piss on the walls.  That as well as i don't see
defacement's as the second coming of jeebus or the fall of modern
civilization.   Oh and i dont see any posts or news articles about how
Jedediah plans to build the first self replicating nano bots or any
other l33t ideas or sploits..

Again just my halfbraind op...

Dre

On 9/27/05, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
> Why hasn't a big company like Symantec bought Zone-H then, if its such
> a good service? Like Symantec did for Securityfocus and stuff.
>
> I mean its not like the real hackers don't brag about the
> vulnerabilities and exploits they discover, is it?
>
> You would think a big company like Symantec would want to own Zone-H,
> since thats where the malicious side of Securityfocus's Bugtraq is
> reported.
>
> I'm sure the feds have ways of detecting cyber terrorism, without the
> help of public sites like Zone-H. And if they don't, why?
>
> On 9/27/05, Andre Ludwig <andre.ludwig@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Zone-h does much more of a service then you would think at first
> > glance.  Just think of all those feds pouring over that site
> > collecting evidence and building profiles of groups.
> >
> > Let the kiddies continue to brag,  it makes those poor "i just did
> > learnded computors" cops have some easy fruit to pick.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ