full-disclosure - Suggestion for IDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <433ABD3D.8010002@csuohio.edu>
Date: Wed Sep 28 16:58:21 2005
From: michael.holstein at csuohio.edu (Michael Holstein)
Subject: Suggestion for IDS

> If you NAT a lot, PIX can't handle the load.  It also isn't flexible 
> enough.

Huh? .. the FWSM (which is PIX and you can have 4 of them in a chassis) 
can handle 100 intefaces, 5gpbs, 100k CPS, and 1M concurrent per blade.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/ps4452/

Show me an OpenBSD system that can handle 400 interfaces, 20gbps, and 4M 
connections (and can do HSRP, etc).

(I'm not trying to start an open-source "holy war" on a newsgrop .. I 
use pf too, where I need the granularity -- just not on the whole network).

~Mike.