full-disclosure - Suggestion for IDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55A13E2E0FC4784A8011271FA862F3D201B79091@CESCEEXC01.cesce.pt>
Date: Wed Sep 28 17:47:29 2005
From: vventura at cesce.pt (Vitor Ventura)
Subject: Suggestion for IDS

I'm not so sure that FWSM runs PIXOS, but with all that interfaces think about the rules managment nighmare.

	-----Mensagem original----- 
	De: Michael Holstein [mailto:michael.holstein@...ohio.edu] 
	Enviada: qua 28-09-2005 16:56 
	Para: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk 
	Cc: 
	Assunto: Re: [Full-disclosure] Suggestion for IDS
	
	


	> If you NAT a lot, PIX can't handle the load.  It also isn't flexible
	> enough.
	
	Huh? .. the FWSM (which is PIX and you can have 4 of them in a chassis)
	can handle 100 intefaces, 5gpbs, 100k CPS, and 1M concurrent per blade.
	
	http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/ps4452/
	
	Show me an OpenBSD system that can handle 400 interfaces, 20gbps, and 4M
	connections (and can do HSRP, etc).
	
	(I'm not trying to start an open-source "holy war" on a newsgrop .. I
	use pf too, where I need the granularity -- just not on the whole network).
	
	~Mike.
	_______________________________________________
	Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
	Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
	Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/