[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E97F0997FB84D42B221B9FB203EFA27017D9A96@dc1ms2.msad.brookshires.net>
Date: Wed Sep 28 20:46:49 2005
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: Is the Bottom Line Impacted by Security
Breaches?
Plus, it was shown recently that personal credit card fraud via ID theft
is smaller than victimless credit card fraud.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/16/gartner_phantom_fraud/
It is a very good rundown on why the banks just really don't have a
reason to chase after them and stop them.
-Todd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf
> Of Frank Knobbe
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 1:54 PM
> To: ken@...security.com
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Is the Bottom Line Impacted by
> Security Breaches?
>
> On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 10:22 -0400, Kenneth F. Belva wrote:
> > In the paper I ask: "If 40 million customer credit card numbers are
> > exposed in a security breach at the credit card processor
> CardSystems,
> > why do a significant number of people not cancel their Visa and/or
> > Mastercard?"
>
> Simple. The credit card numbers are exposed every time they
> make a purchase as well. Now, it someone commits fraud with
> your name and card number (which a convenience store clerk
> can do himself... no high-profile server breach needed), then
> the customer is only liable for minimal damages. The risk and
> liability lies with the credit card company.
>
> Perhaps you should ask:
> "If 40 million customer social security numbers are exposed
> in a security breach at the credit card processor
> CardSystems, why do a significant number of people not
> request new social security numbers?"
>
> After all, there is no limit on liability with fraud on those....
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists