| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <63044F1B3ED49545AA815922B2DFF2240B7E5880@wdcrobe2m02.ed.gov> Date: Mon Oct 3 19:21:52 2005 From: Christopher.Cooper at ed.gov (Cooper, Christopher) Subject: RE: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 8, Issue 3 * Jason Coombs: /* There is simply no way for law enforcement to know the difference between innocent and guilty persons based on hard drive data circumstantial evidence. */ Jason, Are you stumping for work as a defense expert? I hope so, because I know several Law Enforcement Officers who would love to challenge your positions in court. You are over gerneralization an issue and group of people. It IS possible for law enforcement or anyone examining data to know the difference between innocent and guilty persons based on hard drive data. One simply needs to look beyond the general information provided to them from the software tools. Can you give me an example of a trojan, worm, or another program which has added the last USB device installed in the Windows Registry, or how about a program, worm, trojan - which caused something to be added to the last typed URL? Off of Subject: Do you plan to fix the links from your site at: http://www.science.org/jasonc/writing.html - most of the links no longer exist or don't have your name on the published line. Thanks and cheers. -C... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 3239 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051003/7c6febf0/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists