full-disclosure - Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510031953130.26352-100000@bugsbunny.castlecops.com>
Date: Tue Oct  4 00:55:02 2005
From: zx at castlecops.com (Paul Laudanski)
Subject: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing
	PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue




On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Debasis Mohanty wrote:

> >> Paul Laudanski
> >> What I'm saying is that the vendor never claimed ZAP versions prior to 5
> are not vulnerable in the report.  
> 
> Funny Paul!! You are simple exaggerating upon the same point again and again
> in a new style each time. Well, They don't even say that ZAP versions prior
> to v5 are vulnerable in their advisory. 

Glad I made you laugh.  We are at odds in this clearly.  Zone Labs aka
Cisco imvho has issued a fair and accurate release indicating what is not
vulnerable and thereby conversely you know which products are.

To that end... I move on.

Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security
CastleCops(SM), http://castlecops.com