[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200510041633.j94GXsZX032354@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue Oct 4 17:34:26 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: SecureW2 TLS security problem
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:08:40 +0200, Simon Josefsson said:
> ??? The process ID of the current process requesting random data
> ??? The thread ID of the current thread within the process requesting random
data
> ??? A 32bit tick count since the system boot
> ??? The current local date and time
> ??? The current system time of day information consisting of the boot time, c
urrent time, time zone
> ...
> plus many more sources.
>
> I wonder if anybody has quantified the amount of entropy that could
> realistically be extracted from the mentioned sources.
Umm.. "not much". ;)
For instance, note that there's "32 bit tick count" and "current time". Wandering
over to Netcraft will give you the uptime - and how many times do they fold
"current time" in there? Each additional one adds exactly zero entropy. Similarly,
you get 4.5 bits of entropy *MAX* from 'time zone' - and if you can guess where
the box is down to the continent, you're down to 2-3 tops, and possibly exactly 0
if you know the city....
Similarly, if "process ID" and "thread ID" are sequentially allocated integers,
there's probably only 3-4 bits of entropy in the process ID (since at each reboot,
everything starts in the same order each time)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051004/a802991f/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists