| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200510071643.j97GhLWg016044@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Fri Oct 7 17:43:40 2005 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Websites vulnerabilities disclosure On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:38:34 +0530, Raghu Chinthoju said: > I say, "... hey listen! your house entrance door latch isn't strong > enough.. there are only 4 screws instead 16, which is the practice.. > you have a risk of some one easily barging into your house ...". For > some reason you don't respond.. I publish it in the local news paper > that ".. Mr. X's door latch is week and any one can break it easily > ..." Do you think it is ethical??? I seriously think not. The ethics change somewhat if instead of Mr. X, it's a branch of a bank with many customers, or one of those "You-Store-It" storage facilities, or if it's a medical research lab that works with dangerous pathogens, or anyplace else where it's more than just Mr. X's goods or well-being that's endangered.... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051007/e54a05b0/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists