| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri Oct 14 16:35:58 2005 From: jftucker at gmail.com (James Tucker) Subject: IMLogic telling porkies about Yahoo Sorry for the extremety of my blunt response, but I have two things to say: 1. How the fuck do YOU know any more than they do? Just because you obsess over the security factors around a company with which you have no affiliation does not put you in any greater authority to make statements like those you made there. 2. I have absolutely no interest in the topic of Yahoo! as a general view. Please keep your Yahoo orientated discussions on a Yahoo! lovers list or similar. I will contend statistics I read on my own, and decide my own level of trust. I certainly am not going to trust a random person with the name "n3td3v" to provide me more accurate statistics than a company devoted to the topic, as such, your statement of observation (which is completely unjustified in your blog entry, I might add) bears no relevance here. Moreover it can be best classed as a political attack, which is actively discouraged by the list charter. Oh, and just FYI: http://www.technewsworld.com/story/43364.html Did you even check up on your own imagination before writing that, or does it just flow straight out the fingers? -Yet another donation to the WWWaste. On 10/14/05, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > http://n3td3v.blogspot.com/2005/10/imlogic-telling-porkies-about-yahoo.html > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists