full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <012801c5dbcf$c921b5b0$150810ac@ddt2d2b883c4a1>
Date: Fri Oct 28 15:56:43 2005
From: valdis at antivirus.lv (Valdis Shkesters)
Subject: Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind

Hi,

As today I was preparing news for a portal on IT security,
I am informed that Anti-Spyware Coalition is finalizing spyware
definition. It is last moment to finalize with  spyware, because
at the horizon already has appeared ?crimeware?. Take a look
at http://www.antiphishing.org/. I?m quoting: ?Technical subterfuge
schemes plant crimeware onto PCs to steal credentials directly,
often using Trojan keylogger spyware.?
Maybe it would be better to call Trojan horses Trojan horses?

Regards,

Valdis

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerome Athias" <jerome.athias@...e.fr>
To: "Valdis Shkesters" <valdis@...ivirus.lv>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further 
behind

>
> Valdis Shkesters wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Maybe better to call the things their names and not to create havoc?
>
> sure. Maybe will be interesting for you:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/28/anti-spyware_defs/
>