full-disclosure - new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000e01c5dfb8$3f6976e0$0400a8c0@winxp64>
Date: Wed Nov  2 14:18:59 2005
From: ad at class101.org (ad@...ss101.org)
Subject: new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

My message isn't for ppl having their mind on a word I put in it but for
workers interested to look in it , then if the ppl ban me honestly I don?t
care , the bug will remain here :)

-----Message d'origine-----
De?: Marlen Caemmerer [mailto:nosy@...ase.org] 
Envoy??: mercredi 2 novembre 2005 15:14
??: ad@...ss101.org
Objet?: RE: [Full-disclosure] new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

Hello,

reading your posts 2 things come into my mind

1) did you try it on several maschines with win98?
2) if you get personal and not exclusively stay at the context and try
to get people by telling them what you did either people will not read
your messages anymore and wont even try what you suggested or they will
be meaner.

Just my 2 cents
 		nosy

On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 ad@...ss101.org wrote:

> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:57:00 +0100
> From: ad@...ss101.org
> To: 'J u a n' <perfectirijillo@...il.com>
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)
> 
> Your mind you know where to put it ? k  thank you.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: J u a n [mailto:perfectirijillo@...il.com]
> Envoy??: mercredi 2 novembre 2005 14:53
> ??: ad@...ss101.org
> Cc?: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Objet?: Re: [Full-disclosure] new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)
>
> On 11/2/05, ad@...ss101.org <ad@...ss101.org> wrote:
>> This appear much correct than to say it is not working on ie6 98se... Im
>> doing a snapshot to prove I haven't made a mistake.
>>
>
> no one care if you've made a mistake or not, is it really that
> important to you to prove yourself right?
> I don't care for messages like this either:
> "Again shut the fuck up , it also crashes on 98SE I have it here IDIOT."
> (repeated 11 times).