full-disclosure - Re: new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <001f01c5e0b8$1fde6500$5601010a@P4>
Date: Thu Nov  3 20:50:11 2005
From: full-disclosure at pchandyman.com.au (Greg)
Subject: Re: new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Korn" <davek_throwaway@...mail.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:14 AM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: new IE bug (confirmed on ALL windows)

> Greg wrote in news:002101c5dfec$3928ac90$5601010a@P4
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "bkfsec" bkfsec@....lonestar.org
>
>>> To be honest, anyone who doesn't understand the previous paragraph,
>>> needs to shut the fuck up, report their results, and let the rest >
>>> of us who have a clue sort the shit out.
>>
>> It isn't hard to prove he is wrong.
>
>  Tragic.  You clearly didn't understand that previous paragraph, after 
> all. If only you had stopped, while you were behind.  If only you had 
> taken bkfsec's sage advice.  Now I'm just going to _have_ to publicly 
> humiliate you.  So let's start with the first point:
>

Sigh.... the above sort of posting is just what gets me here. We have people 
who know so much more than those who have posted on this thread who rarely 
comment due to comments like that. Whatever happened to civility in posting, 
here? I would rather them not be frightened away.

To answer your unfortunate comments though - the crash does not occur on 
WIN98SE *ENGLISH* IE6SP2 edition when employed by me from a P2 400Mhz which 
is running wired to this machine which then routes it wireless to my router. 
This machine is behind ZA Pro for the heck of it. That was what I posted and 
remains true. I did *NOT* try any other language version which may or may 
not crash. As I explained and you seem not to want to grasp is that it 
doesn't crash as I have described. Now as I said in my post, *WHY* it 
doesn't crash I leave to those who are interested in the differences. I also 
noted it does crash on XPSP2 using IE6SP2 behind exactly the same conditions 
as the 98SE machine and it crashes IE6SP2 on this XPSP2 machine.

Now why you see that as a problem more than something that should be 
investigated I don't know but they remain the irrefutable facts.

Greg.