full-disclosure - RE: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 9, Issue 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0511062207280.20494-100000@tundra.winternet.com>
Date: Mon Nov  7 04:10:06 2005
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: RE: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 9, Issue 3

On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:

> Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor wrote:
> >
> > Nick, hi... why would you want to filter out the digests? will this
> > eliminate digests from my subscriptioin?
>
> It would have nothing to do with *sending* the digests, and everything
> to do with stopping tards that hit reply to a 70kb digest containing 20
> messages, add a single word reply without trimming anything, and spew it
> all back to the list.  It also breaks threading when someone replies to
> a digest using a mail client that's too dumb to reply to individual
> mails in a digest.  Don't "security professionals" know how to use email
> for god's sake?

What makes you think at this day in age, "security professionals" are no
more pigeon holed in skills then other IT professionals?  limited tools in
daily use tend to depricate those with skills over a braoder spectrum at
an earlier point of time, let alone that CISSP is the only real
qualification for the claim.

Thanks,



Ron DuFresne
-- 
"Sometimes you get the blues because your baby leaves you. Sometimes you get'em
'cause she comes back." --B.B. King
        ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.