full-disclosure - Re: [xfocus-AD-051115]Multiple antivirus failedto scan malicous filename bypass vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAANASp/bip1hHgg1O1cfiAEPCgAAAEAAAAMyBTt25hthMk9oKnYPFB7kBAAAAAA==@online.gateway.strangled.net>
Date: Wed Nov 16 04:37:42 2005
From: aditya.deshmukh at online.gateway.strangled.net (Aditya Deshmukh)
Subject: Re: [xfocus-AD-051115]Multiple antivirus
	failedto scan malicous filename bypass vulnerability

> axo>   Demonstration here:
> axo>   Choose a malicious file which would be detected, such as nc.exe,
> axo>   rename the file as nc??.exe (?? =Hex C0 D7 BA DC)
> axo>   Because these special names are unable directly to input, so if you
> axo>   want to run these file, you should use the following way:
> axo>   Uses the MS-DOS name specification, we can operate  file with
Open?
> axo>   Read?Write? and duplicate?

> That means that if the user clicks on it using explorer.exe or
> iexplorer.exe the file won't be executed because even Microsoft
> Windows explorer is unable to parse the file?
 
It will be executed because the if windows is not able to 
Access the long file name then short file name is used to 
Access the file in +x or execute mode...