full-disclosure - Hacking Boot camps!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2be58a30511230941g1a967f33h6424bda57d356db4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Nov 23 17:41:49 2005
From: infosecbofh at gmail.com (InfoSecBOFH)
Subject: Hacking Boot camps!

On 11/23/05, Exibar <exibar@...lair.com> wrote:
> I agree, BUT for someone that is just starting out and want's to get into
> the InfoSec field.  SANS will provide them with a very useful foundation to
> start from.
>   if they're a PC tech, and don't know where to start, a SANS type course
> is money well spent.  AS LONG AS they back it up with their own practice and
> research on their own.

WRONG.  SANS does not provide anything but marketing opportunities for
vendors who cannot sell product any other way and a thicker wallet for
those at the top of the pyramid scheme.  I agree that training when
you are starting out is important but SANS is not an ethical or
legitimate training institution and does more to harm security than it
does to help.