full-disclosure - Return of the Phrack High Council

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2be58a30511240156y241eac7er20a26127e87198f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Nov 24 09:56:40 2005
From: infosecbofh at gmail.com (InfoSecBOFH)
Subject: Return of the Phrack High Council

PHC = Phrack High Councle

Back in the day... wow that makes me look old.. they owned a few
whitehat faggots and made them look stupid.

FD is not a whitehat list.. FD is a list for assholes... seriously it
is.. if you want a whitehat list you go to bugtraq or vulnwatch..
those are true whitehat lists... this is a list for idiots and
trolls... yes including me.

you are right hat you cannot verify the identity of PHC... but thats
the entire point now isnt it.  I mean come on... Big Fix wouldnt have
Blue Boar working for them if it wasnt for PHC..

fucking whitehat-hate mofo!

On 11/24/05, michael tewner <tewner@....ac.il> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, InfoSecBOFH wrote:
>
> > SWEET!!!
> >
> > Welcome back PHC... you have been missed... now lets have Gobbles back
> > too please... the infosec industry is back to an all time slime and
> > its time you guys took some fucking names and kicked some ass.
> >
>
> While I'm not new to computer security, I am new to the politics involved.
>
> 1. who is PHC? (all I get is anti-whitehat propoganda)
> 2. Why does this announcment come from gmail.com? Don't tell me for
> anonymity. If PHC is half as 'leet' as they make themselves out to be, I
> don't think they'de resort to anonymity this way.
> 3. How do we even know this person is related in any way, and didni't just
> get some gmail address?
> 4. This seems like an ironic post to a white-hat list. Perhaps the first
> was designed to "instil fear," but that wouldn't explain the enthusiastic
> reply (quoted).
>
> Or just disreguard this if I have no idea what i'm talking about - again,
> i'm new to this politics thing, and I wasn't beaten as a child.
>
>