[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAANASp/bip1hHgg1O1cfiAEPCgAAAEAAAAG/Ar2S72thHilvOd7FpTMkBAAAAAA==@online.gateway.strangled.net>
Date: Thu Dec 1 06:19:42 2005
From: aditya.deshmukh at online.gateway.strangled.net (Aditya Deshmukh)
Subject: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance
> Seeing how my question was ignored. I will tell you the answer.
>
> There is no requirement in SOX to do this.
Why cant you use google to find out this ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nonprofitrisk.org/nwsltr/archive/employprac091005-p.htm
*In the para 4*
"Protecting whistleblowers is an essential component of an ethical
and open work environment."
*In para 6* <----- this is the one that you want
"Provide Employees Multiple Avenues to Report Concerns"
While employees will hopefully feel comfortable raising concerns
directly with their supervisors, many employees are reluctant to
raise concerns with line management for fear of retaliation,
especially where their concerns pertain to unethical or illegal
conduct by their line managers. Therefore, nonprofits should provide
several options for employees to raise concerns, including the
option of raising a concern anonymously.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read the last line in para 6 you will find that anon mailbox
is a requirement for SOX compliance.
And mailbox was ment for email Michael :)
But I think that "with a post and some concrete" mailbox will be
Indeed be far more secure.....
________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists