full-disclosure - Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAANASp/bip1hHgg1O1cfiAEPCgAAAEAAAAIEEb3wIsYZBi+qNA5cG5ScBAAAAAA==@online.gateway.strangled.net>
Date: Fri Dec  2 04:16:37 2005
From: aditya.deshmukh at online.gateway.strangled.net (Aditya Deshmukh)
Subject: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance

> 
> > Why cant you use google to find out this ?
> 
> The same reason you can't use Google and find your answer fuckbag.

Are you n3td3v ? 

> 
> > *In the para 4*
> > "Protecting whistleblowers is an essential component of an ethical
> > and open work environment."
> 
> No mention of an anon email address here.
> 
> 
> > *In para 6* <----- this is the one that you want
> >  several options for employees to raise concerns, including the
> >  option of raising a concern anonymously.
> 
> Again, not specifying email.  A simple drop box in the lunchroom
> facilitates this.

"A simple drop box in the lunchroom" will not work when you have a
client that is big enough to have branches distributed all over the
place. 

Anon Email is the best solution for this - you don't have to manually 
Check the boxes in all the locations with the headache of keeping the
Contents of the box classified.

And if you had read my first email *and* comprehended what I had asked
you would have not being writing the mail that I am responding to.