full-disclosure - Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2ba066b20512020324p32da5511o8fd482280b75d86f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri Dec  2 11:24:34 2005
From: rs2321 at gmail.com (R S)
Subject: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance

On 12/2/05, Aditya Deshmukh <aditya.deshmukh@...ine.gateway.strangled.net>
wrote:
>
> >
> > > Why cant you use google to find out this ?
> >
> > The same reason you can't use Google and find your answer fuckbag.
>
>

Are you n3td3v ?

In the spirit of full-disclosure I support anyone's [doesn't matter if it is
a troll like infosecbofh or netdev] right to express their opinion, but
turning abusive should be a reason enough to be kicked off any public
mailing list. I have already filtered out these people, but I still get to
read some of the abusive emails because some others feel that these people
deserve a reply.

Can the moderator please issue a warning to these abusive trolls? Also is it
too much to ask the "great security minds" in this list to contain their
need to reply to these trolls?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051202/845f32c9/attachment.html