full-disclosure - SOX whistleblower requirements challenged in court? (Was SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DEDFD939A181F94AAF3D965C58B7AADC01FCE569@001fntcex01.fnb.fnni.com>
Date: Fri Dec  2 14:19:25 2005
From: mmadison at fnni.com (Madison, Marc)
Subject: SOX whistleblower requirements challenged
	in court? (Was SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance)

"Challenged" may not have been the appropriate word, again IANAL, google
sox+whistleblower+court.


Or if you trust me then just click on the below link  ;)

www.nixonpeabody.com/linked_media/publications/ELA_12282004.pdf




-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Jesse W.
Asher
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 5:55 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] SOX whistleblower requirements challenged in
court? (Was SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance)


I was curious about the mention of "the SOX whistleblowers requirements
have been challenged in court".  Can anyone provide more information on
this?  What has challenged and why?  Thanks!!

>>From: Madison, Marc [mailto:mmadison@...i.com] IANAL, But IMO use an 
>>Intranet web page that allows employees to submit anonymous html post 
>>to the web server via html.  Now if your security policy is pervasive 
>>then surely auditing is enabled on all your systems, thus removing any

>>anonymity this would have provided.  Have you considered, dare I say, 
>>outsourcing?  I only say this since part of the requirement calls for 
>>the company to provide sufficient anonymity to individuals reporting 
>>issues.  By the way the SOX whistleblowers requirements have already 
>>been challenged in court so there might be precedence on what is 
>>sufficient.
>>    
>>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/