full-disclosure - McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e024ccca0512091212k6c39c774vbb6d406a1ecc8bad@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri Dec  9 20:12:44 2005
From: dudevanwinkle at gmail.com (Dude VanWinkle)
Subject: McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x

On 12/9/05, Michael Holstein <michael.holstein@...ohio.edu> wrote:

> In my enterprise environment (McAfee, BTW), I would *want* copies of
> Metasploit yanked automatically from a PC.

McAffe also has the ability to label applications as "Security
Threats" without categorizing them as a virus.

viri spread without much user interaction, MSF is an application not a virus.

its just more lazy programmers, this email will probably trigger a
McAfee alert in a few minutes

-JP
"Getting in a argument on a mailing list is like competing in the
Special Olympics: Even if you win you are still a retard"
-A Friend