full-disclosure - McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4399F11D.8060604@csuohio.edu>
Date: Fri Dec  9 21:05:09 2005
From: michael.holstein at csuohio.edu (Michael Holstein)
Subject: McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x

> Why dont you build a snort signature for it first (what bleeding or
> VRT dont have one yet???)? Seeing how you guys run snort on your
> network ;)

Because I'll catch the kiddies when they try and actually use Metasploit 
on something, and then they'll get expelled from school after a student 
conduct hearing.

> So chalk it up guys, they use snort and McAfee, care to tell us your
> firewall types? Maybe an admin pw or something?

Intersting point about using list comments for recon .. but we're a 
state institution, so you could legally get copies of all our purchase 
orders, bids, etc .. and figure out where we buy lightbulbs, drain 
cleaner, or firewalls for that matter.

Cheers,

Michael Holstein CISSP GCIA
Cleveland State University