[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200512142110.jBELAHj1006938@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed Dec 14 21:10:40 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Phishing Alert: Inland Revenue Service
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:56:58 GMT, n3td3v said:
> The phishing e-mail I am talking about was sent directly to my
> security news wire (see headers), I feel I have a responsibility to
> report on it.
Non-scalable. If people actually start *reading* your news wire, then
the address *will* be harvested and spammed and phished. If the spam
volume is so low that reporting a single incident is worthwhile, it
means nobody's reading. And if by some odd circumstance it actually
gets readers, do you intend to report on each incident, out of the dozen
or 6 dozen a day you'll see?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051214/205b215d/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists