[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFA605D858.82C9AA96-ON882570D8.00809943-882570D8.0081C42F@notesmail.csulb.edu>
Date: Thu Dec 15 23:36:28 2005
From: rsumida at csulb.edu (Ryan Sumida)
Subject: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A
MODERATED LIST
Enrico Kern <phantom@....org> wrote on 12/15/2005 10:28:43 AM:
> forget it,
>
> we discussed this a few weeks ago, most of the guys on this list just
love
> to get spam and bullshit. The one side says "well yeah omg its no
> full-disclosure anymore with moderation" (penguin fucker style) and the
> others want the trash sorted out.
>
> Well from my point of view a moderated list will help to enhance the
> quality on full-disclosure, moderation doesnt mean that full-disclosure
of
> a vulnerability isnt posslible anymore (hello wtf is wrong with you? we
> just want the trash sorted out).
>
> Actually Full-Disclosure lost so much of the art and quality it had in
the
> past, its just sad. "omg omg why do you read FD if you dont like it"
> replys are wrong here, Full-Disclosure is still a great list, but its
full
> of trash lately.
>
> What about making a second full-disclosure list with moderated content
> (sorting out the kids) of the original list?
>
You've got to be kidding me with this BS. If you want the trash sorted
out do it yourself. If you are looking for a moderated full-disclosure
then I suggest bugtraq.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051215/7c6a356a/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists