full-disclosure - a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ffa8196a0512150210q7bc186fdgaaa55dc43919f97d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Dec 15 10:10:46 2005
From: namepipe at gmail.com (name pipe)
Subject: a call for full-disclosure to become a
	moderated list

ya but those half subscribers are kids who do nothing except pissing at each
other in the list. When the list was started there werent such number of
kids pissing in the list. But now time is changed and lots of lamers are
there. Its time that this list shud be moderated.

On 12/15/05, InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hey cry baby, the only reason this list exists and has half the
> subscribers it has is because of the lack of moderation.  If this list
> was moderated it would be nothing more than Bugtraq
>
> On 12/14/05, mis@...den.com <mis@...den.com> wrote:
> > it seems to me that without a moderator (since there is the apparent
> > absence of people who are moderate, or even civilized), this list will
> > continue its degeneration into a never-ending pissing contest.
> >
> > (some people don't seem to think that the social compact one accepts
> > when joining a list applies to them.
> >
> > my most recent attempt to politely, in direct email, ask one of the
> > offenders to stop doing this sort of thing on the list ...  was posted
> > with a twerpy reply right back to the list).  (no good deed goes
> > unpunished).
> >
> > how many people who actually find value in this list (which i have,
> > since len rose set it up quite a long time ago) agree with this
> > position?
> >
> > if you think there's a compelling reason for no moderation, i'd like to
> hear it.
> >
> > i call to your attention three brief selections from the list charter,
> > which is at
> > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > which i think have been violated recently:
> >
> > "Members are expected to maintain a reasonable standard of netiquette
> when posting to the list."
> > "Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion should be
> taken off-list wherever possible."
> > "Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is
> forbidden."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051215/f5583fd3/attachment-0001.html