lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E97F0997FB84D42B221B9FB203EFA2701EB937D@dc1ms2.msad.brookshires.net>
Date: Thu Dec 15 16:35:27 2005
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A
	MODERATEDLIST

> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  
> MAKING THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A 
> SECURITY RESEARCHER.  I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL 
> INFORMED CHOICES IN MY DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING 
> LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF 
> THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS LIST.  MODERATING 
> WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND WOULD BRING IT 
> ONE STEP ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.
> 
> ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.

I am in 150% support of you not using CAPS. As if it needs to be said
again, there are moderated lists you can join...go join them and quit
trying to change FD.

As I stated on FD in March, "if you wanted a clean list that is
moderated, I would suggest 
you start with Security Basics or Bugtraq." -
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2005-03/0737.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ