full-disclosure - A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME AMODERATEDLIST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu Dec 15 17:25:05 2005
From: jasonjones at brookshires.com (Jason Jones)
Subject: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME
	AMODERATEDLIST

If it takes caps, or foul language to get you point across then it must
not be of importance and that's your only way to get attention. If
attention you want do something to make the national news. 

I guess some of us have way to much time on our hands and not enough
real work to do. FD doesn't need moderation, or vote kicking. It needs
the kiddies to grow up and get past puberty.

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Lane
Weast
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:41 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME
AMODERATEDLIST

Please reject email from the rude people who insist on typing in all
caps.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:16:46 -0800
<uber@...h.com> wrote:

> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  MAKING 
> THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY RESEARCHER.

> I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY DAY TO DAY 
> TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE GOOD STUFF AND

> NONE OF THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS LIST.  MODERATING 
> WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND WOULD BRING IT ONE STEP

> ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.
> 
> ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.

Moderation... moderation...
Well..

If you smoke a pipe and think about it you'll get 2 problems:

1. Moderation is a kind of cencorship
2. Who should moderate the list? 1 guy? 2? 3? 4?
   Do they realy know what IS importent for everybody?

I would angree that users who spam too much should get kicked of. But as
I said.. if you smoke a pipe you'll get some ideas:

You could delete e-Mails from such idiots. Or you could train "bmf". ;-)

Kind regards,
Rembrandt
- --
God did a bless on me,
So accapt the dark side in you.
Hate leads me to victory, so give me a war.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD)

iD8DBQFDoZqIHXWDTKj6tTkRAk6XAKCWyvXnKQGLyo9VrYk5Jlzgi4+dOQCgzJnL
Z8JKp0tI4vrcyeMR8UAzock=
=KSKI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/