full-disclosure - Moderated lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f3ecb5a0512151000w6b3a4a60yfa36976e6cff0988@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Dec 15 18:01:00 2005
From: alindeman at gmail.com (Andy Lindeman)
Subject: Moderated lists

If the ultimate goal is to keep the "crap" factor down, moderation
will only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the
noise ratio.

--A

On 12/15/05, FullDis.20.mandoskippy@...mgourmet.com
<FullDis.20.mandoskippy@...mgourmet.com> wrote:
> Why not do a self-regulating list?  Something along the lines of keeping
> track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo starts
> spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only members older then xyz
> date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user banned, then so
> be it...
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>