[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43A748B2.2030604@binaryfreedom.info>
Date: Mon Dec 19 23:56:38 2005
From: rek2 at binaryfreedom.info (rek2)
Subject: An uncontrolled ***OFFTOPIC***
thread ... America's
future under George Bush ... my last post in this thread
Im sorry I don't usually take sides here but this is all CNN/FOX news
bull shit.
lets keep the Americanish for the right win american TV. we all know
that the USA is a big hype
and only some of its citizents belive it. I never saw an inocent
american die in any WAR...
TJ wrote:
>Yes, there is always more than one side to every story.
>
>And, yes - everyone has a right to *peaceable* nuclear power. *Peaceable*
>being the key word there ... as for saying "Good for the goose, good for the
>gander" - NO; when people are killing innocents they deserve to not have the
>chance to continue.
>
>I'm sorry - has Bush ever said he wanted to wipe Iran off the map?
>I doubt it.
>
>Actually no, I am pretty comfortable with the situation IN the US - I am
>apparently arguing with those who would rather have more innocent Americans
>die and have more nuclear-capable terrorists.
>
>It has nothing to do with getting the last word - I was going to let it
>drop, until someone called me "weak". A stinging insult indeed!
>
>
>If you cared about more than spreading garbage, you'd take the high-road and
>take this "discussion" offlist ... like others have correctly done.
>
>
>No further on-list comments.
>/TJ ... sorry to have added to this thread even more, I hate feeding trolls.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Byron Sonne [mailto:blsonne@...ers.com]
>Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:32 PM
>To: trejrco@...il.com; Full-Disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] An uncontrolled ***OFFTOPIC*** thread ...
>America's future under George Bush
>
>
>
>>And - about permitting Iran to develop nuclear power "because the US is a
>>bully" ... WTF?
>>
>>
>
>More than one side to the story, homes... everyone has the right to
>peacable nuclear power. Even if they did develop nukes, it's in their
>right. If the USA, Russia + satellite states, France, UK, India,
>Pakistan and Israel are allowed to do it, why not anyone else? Good for
>the goose, good for the gander.
>
>The USA failed to lead by example, and are now reaping the rewards.
>
>
>
>>You are talking about Iran, a nation whose leader is
>>delusional and has voiced support of destroying another nation outright.
>>
>>
>
>Susbistute 'USA' for 'Iran' and the sentence sounds like the same crap
>other people say about the USA. You sound just like the jerks that your
>troops are allegedly fighting against. Ever consider there's some brown
>skinned dude in a turban thinking almost the same kind of thoughts as
>you, except it's about America instead?
>
>The USA has made it's bed, and now you're finding it uncomfortable to
>sleep in? Haha.
>
>
>
>>You may disagree with my position, and that is "fine" ... but this forum
>>
>>
>is
>
>
>>not the correct place to debate the issue - can we please let this list
>>return to topic now?
>>
>>
>
>So as long as you get your last word in, everyone has to shut up? Feh.
>Weak dude.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists