full-disclosure - An uncontrolled ***OFFTOPIC*** thread ... America's future under George Bush ... my last post in this thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue Dec 20 03:26:40 2005
From: measl at mfn.org (J.A. Terranson)
Subject: An uncontrolled ***OFFTOPIC*** thread ...
	America's future under George Bush ... my last post in this thread

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Chris Umphress wrote:

> On 12/19/05, J.A. Terranson <measl@....org> wrote:
> >
> > America is odd in that is is an active supporter of terrorism (Israel), an
>
> Come again? Israel is a terrorist state? How in the world did you get
> your mind bent enough that this even seems right?

repeat it with me:  M-E-N-A-C-H-I-M  B-E-G-I-N.

Isarel was FOUNDED on terrorism, and as with the proverbial tiger, has
never felt the need to change it's stripes.

> Just a guess, but are you for gun-control also?

I fail to see how these are even remotely related, but i'll bite anyway:
No, I do not believe in "gun control" (ie confiscation).

> Against a person's
> right to defend his own life and freedom? Oh wait... that's what this
> whole thread is about. Whether or not people should be able to have
> the guns they need to protect themselves. As long as people can defend
> themselves, it almost doesn't matter how big the "weapon" (I see it as
> a tool, not a weapon) is, but rather the resolve of the people.

So, clearly we are on the same side of *this* fence.  Now, why are we
here?

> In the
> past, the united States has had few external attacks because it was
> realized that the people were willing and capable of defending
> themselves.

And that same confidence has now morphed into a bullying attitude of
"We're bigger than you, we'll do whatever the hell we damn well please.".

Except for thos "Axis of Evil" areas that can actually defend themselves
against an American invasion (vis Kim Jong Il.).  If Kim is so god awful,
why the hell don't we invade there?  Because he'd blow our fucking asses
off the landing pad.  A nuclear enema for Shrub.  And a well deserved one
I might add.

> --
> Chris Umphress <http://daga.dyndns.org/>
>

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF

	Just once, can't we have a nice polite discussion about
	the logistics and planning side of large criminal enterprise?

	- Steve Thompson