Message-ID: <4b6ee9310512210624q6cad4c3bp240e1f3f0874bdf7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Dec 21 14:25:07 2005
From: xploitable at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: N3td3v poll

I really think if I or my people were to take the opportunity to study
the code, there would a lot than 36 votes sitting on that file. No one
has the spare resources to even care about hacking such a meaningless,
child-like poll. Time to get back to what counts, and thats research
into Google and Yahoo. I think if there was a case of vote rigging,
however, it would be carried out by my opponents, who are more than
willing to carry this anti-n3td3v propaganda way into 2006, to ruin my
reputation, and to pollute the list with polls and quotes, seen
already in this and past anti-n3td3v threads. Have a good new year,
i'm sure you'll have no vulnerabilities to disclose, since you're
someone who just hates on people who do disclose vulnerabilities to
vendors and the security community.

On 12/21/05, fok yo <yoo.fok@...il.com> wrote:
> The skies are falling:
> Famous security woe N3td3v found yet another critical internet
> vulnerability, this time in snappoll...
> He managed voting 36 times (once for each alter-ego ?).
> Is snappoll as flawed as diebold?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists