full-disclosure - XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cd8f1f1e0512210948t3abdd6a8o@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Dec 21 17:50:00 2005
From: yoo.fok at gmail.com (fok yo)
Subject: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com

You just don't get it, do you....
The problem isn't xss bugs are the uberlamest, the problem is you reserve
yourself the right to _spam_ us 24/7 by bragging about how once you found a
half-ass xss yourself.
Your signal to noise ratio is simply too low to be bearable.

YOU HAVEN'T ADDED ANY *INTERESTING* SECURITY RELATED CONTENT TO THE LIST,
EVER.
YOU ARE USELESS TO THE SECURITY COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE.
STOP REPLYING TO FD BECAUSE YOU ANNOY 99,99% OF US.
WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER WANNABE.
YOU WASTE OUR TIME.

+ you are __very stupid__, you obviously lack the insight to be the top
notch security pro you think you are, try something else, it's just not
worth it, piece of fuckup.
+ what's your real name? Stop hiding behind a nick and step into the
ligths....
+According to the way you express yourself through email (very simple
language/grammar, especially for a native english speaker, bragging
and trying to prove yourself without valid arguments, not going to the core
of a discussion but trying to hide yourself after the image you think you
created, ... ) , it's obvious you lack any social skills, stop wasting your
time in front of the computer, find a date for new year's eve, coz it'll
be cold and lonely.


2005/12/21, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>:
>
> You trolled this thread by saying Watchfire should stop disclosing
> vulnerabilities for Yahoo and Google. You get the response you
> deserved to get. Now you're running off the thread now with your tail
> between your legs, because everyone has told you that Google and Yahoo
> vulnerabilities (especially XSS) will never be banned from FD.
>
>
> On 12/21/05, GroundZero Security <fd@....org> wrote:
> > yes you are right, but its like if noone tells him what a stupid fag he
> is,
> > he will keep posting and posting his irrelevant crap and just ignore the
> tons of private
> > mail he receives. i'm sorry for adding to the noise, but its just too
> tempting.
> > i try to ignore it. but i cant promise i will, the last mail he sent
> just asks for a reply :P
> > but ok...must...resist.....
> > btw my name is not groundzero, thats my company :)
> >
> > greetz
> > -sk
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051221/3b9022b2/attachment.html