Date: Mon Dec 26 16:10:34 2005
From: stan.bubrouski at gmail.com (Stan Bubrouski)
Subject: Breaking LoJack for Laptops

Hehe I noticed that and didnt bother telling you ;-P

-sb

On 12/25/05, Bob Hacker <bob.hacker@...il.com> wrote:
>
> sorry i misplaced your post with your reality, I replied simply with...   Bob
> Hacker    to Stan
>  More options   Dec 24 (1 day ago)  Its outstanding, I was being sarcastic
> just out of context. Happy New Year List !
>
> =)
> !Z
>
> I replied to stan not the list. Guess I should Have.
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:38:15 -0800 Bob Hacker
> <bob.hacker@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Let me clarify this this to you and others who don't understand the
> slightest about much.
>
> >Allowing 192* to be called from is absurd. And its not that hard
> >to whois
> >the ip, contact the isp who now these days hand over information
> >to almost*
> >anyone with a nice fancy letterhead from a lawyers office. Saying
>
> In case you didn't realize it, the 192.168 range is private. Go
> whois yourself silly trying to find out. Better yet go ask around
> who is 192.168.x.x for kicks.
>
> >Dear Mr
> >ISP bad person using this IP has stolen laptop that sold on ebay
> >for 50
> >bucks, please give us his address so we may take him to court and
> >charge him
> >with possession of stolen property, a misdemenor in most states.
>
> For your information you seem to know little about how things work.
> Go ask any provider for information with any kind of letterhead
> you'd like. See what they will tell you. You seem to be stuck on
> stupid assuming a bonafide provider is going to budge simply
> because some letterhead. Without a court order you'd be wasting a
> piece of paper.
>
> >Yes its
> >logical. But in theory I think the whole thing is like the MS key
> >validate,
> >disable it in windows add-ons and move on. Its like that one time
> >at
> >bandcamp when i was on a lan and didnt know my ip so i went to
> >steve gibsons
> >site.
>
> Wow you are so 31337 to run over to Gibson's site. Case in point no
> need to further clarify anything on my original post. Don't make an
> ass out of yourself responding when you have one half of one half
> of a smidgen of a clue.
>
> > Note. I am sure anyone who has a purchased a stolen laptop ,
> > it had a
> >password on it. So the OS was already installed. just my .02
>
> Instead of wasting time making yourself look more clueless you
> should take some time and actually run along and learn something
> productive. The message had nothing to do with a stolen laptop, it
> had to do with defeating its protection. Whether or not it had/has
> a password is irrelevant. And your last comment made no sense so
> take your two cents and buy yourself a clue.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
> Version: Hush 2.4
>
> wkYEARECAAYFAkOvRFYACgkQo8cxM8/cskrwrwCfc5wIUtYDj1vt5e5A62IKSeNj8UEA
> n0t1uEQ6cJfU51iu24hKwzaZRQpi
> =gxB0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
> Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account
> required
> http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480
>
> Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
> https://www.hushssl.com?l=485
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051226/994d7909/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists