[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20051228143245.GF21359@suespammers.org>
Date: Wed Dec 28 14:32:11 2005
From: rodrigob at suespammers.org (Rodrigo Barbosa)
Subject: Spy Agency Mined Vast Data Trove
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 09:19:26AM -0500, Geo. wrote:
> > Actually after reading some of the the comments I have to say you all
> > missed the point... *IF* you are not doing *nothing illegal* and have
> > nothing to hide no big deal.
>
> If you are not doing anything illegal then there is no need for law
> enforcement to see your papers.
>
> The point sir is that a lot of us feel it's better if a few criminals go
> free than if a few innocent people get locked up. You can't apply standard
> security practices to a population, or you would have to lock up everyone
> and then release those who are not guilty.
The point is a little deeper than that.
How much can we trust the government ? Or, rather, how much can we
trust the people (as in "down to the last one") that work on/for
the government ? Are 100% of the government employees trusthworthy ?
Are you really willing to give everyone there (again: the employees)
a 'carte blanch' to get and maybe use your information ?
Again: even if you think the government is legit, and has real reasons
to do it, are you sure you can trust everyone that has access to the
information ?
On a more philosofical note, how much can you trust someone who distrust
everyone else ?
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@...spammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDsqINpdyWzQ5b5ckRArXPAKCOHEHosaLNaBlOLOE0H7dMxivd4QCglNur
vkLFgOCCwyzryD3qmOv9Gbs=
=KQ8D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists