[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E97F0997FB84D42B221B9FB203EFA2701FA0375@dc1ms2.msad.brookshires.net>
Date: Thu Dec 29 19:15:58 2005
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: test this
Peter wrote:
> Perhaps you should read about it on Microsoft's site.
> It's not a buffer overflow. WMF files since at least Windows
> 3.0 days have been allowed to carry executable code in the
> form of their own SetAbortProc handler. This is perfectly
> legitimate, though the design is a poor one. The only thing
> that has changed is the code that is being executed.
You are correct, that was my oversight in typing (minus the thinking).
No bufferoverflow ;)
-Todd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists