full-disclosure - [COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC NOW] RE: complaints about the governemnt spying!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200512292334.12525.jrestivo@inventhorizons.com>
Date: Fri Dec 30 05:35:09 2005
From: jrestivo at inventhorizons.com (Josh Restivo)
Subject: [COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC NOW] RE: complaints about
	the governemnt spying!

On Thursday 29 December 2005 22:21, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Pete Simpson wrote:
> 
> > Some facts and logic may prove useful.
> 
> Agreed: we're still waiting for some...

Devolution into a bottomless cesspool of contrived and meandering arguments is 
a painful (okay, perhaps occasionally amusing) spectacle to behold. But, to 
witness arguments brazenly concocted of baseless assertions on a*technical* 
list is genuinely pathetic.

Paul, Pete, et. al, if you feel compelled to proffer anything remotely 
non-obvious as a fact in this and similar forums, at least have the decency 
(excepting the existence of a pre-existing independent referable source) to 
fire up vi, wordpad, etc... and slap together a QAD web page purporting to 
verify said 'facts' which you may then refer to. Besides, citations and 
references (even when entirely bogus) make you look all cool and 
scholarly-like. 

For those of us so inclined, we also then have the opportunity to reasonably 
consider your argument. 

Otherwise, STFU. 

-josh