Message-ID: <8824FC7BFD60C14C8FBC279421C2AC7A024F6337@GEMINI.EUROPE.CLEARSWIFT.COM>
Date: Fri Dec 30 03:36:23 2005
From: Pete.Simpson at clearswift.com (Pete Simpson)
Subject: complaints about the governemnt spying!

Some facts and logic may prove useful.

Why do you think that the US government would wish to spy on its own citizens? Ah-ah - Islamo-terrorist sleeper cells have infiltrated the US for possibly a decade. First examine the terrorist angle and then return to the necessity for internal spying.

Nineteeen Islamo-terrorists changed the world irrevocably in September 2001. All 19 wrere identified with photographs and several aliases within 48 hours, yet none were included in the UA or AA passenger lists for those flights. Brilliant detection, but by whom? (that's another story). Colin Powell promised a full report, within a few months, on why they were the culprits. That report never emerged. In July 2002 Robert Mueller (Director of the FBI) admitted (nine of of the 'hijackers' were still alive and well according to the UK BBC) that given that they all had stolen identities, the real perpetrators would never be known. Think about that one and check out the FBI website, which never retracted the clearly false accusations. Was there any mention of that in the Kean Report? No, the guilt of the nineteen accused individuals was a given.

But the real crunch comes when Augian politics defies physics. Sir Issac Newton, long dead, must be laughing hysterically in his grave over this 9/11 stunt. 

Newton proved that the time for an object to fall from a given height, in a vacuum (without air resistance) is the square root of twice the height divided by a constant (acceleration due to gravity). Brilliant deduction. WTC 1 and 2 were 415 and 417 metres high. The constant for the acceleration due to gravity is 9.62 m/s/s. The time for an object to fall under those conditions (in vacuo) is 9.2s.
Now allowing for air resistance one can believe a few seconds more, but allowing for a quarter of a million tonnes of steel and concrete  it is utterly impossible for the twin towers to descend in ten to eleven seceonds. Unless the fall was unimpeded i.e. a controlled demolition. Ask your physicists to refute this argument.

But get this one. WTC7 collapsed at about 5.30 that day (again on its own footprint) without being 'attacked'?

But if you really have a good sense of humour, ask the guys in the Physics Dept. how come no black box flight recorders were found (designed to withstand terrific temperatures and pressures) yet a terrorist's passport was miraculously discovered with just minor burns?

Now why on Earth should the US government wish to carry out surveilance on its own citizens? Maybe some are not comatose?

Best regards,

Pete





Clearswift monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy using Clearswift products.
Find out more about Clearswift, its solutions and services at http://www.clearswift.com

This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of Clearswift. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Clearswift by emailing support@...arswift.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. Clearswift accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the Clearswift domain.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists