[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c3fa2270601041049g1ab8bc4bi8e11147467fcb9f5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jan 4 18:50:15 2006
From: yahooinsider at gmail.com (Joe Average)
Subject: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers,
not security
>From my blog:
""[Unofficial patches are available, as is a leaked official patch]
[Unofficial patches are merely used by hackers as a tool to patch machines
they've compromised, to stop other hackers hacking the same machine,
although the machine is still accessable to the hacker.] [The consumer goes
along to Windows Update on Tuesday and doesn't think they need a patch,
because Microsoft tells them its not needed. Little does the consumer know
their machine was patched by a hacker, who now has control over their
computer network.]""
It means the unofficial patch is as harmful as the vulnerability and exploit
code its self.
On 1/4/06, Niek <niek@...ak.coding-slaves.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/4/2006 7:33 PM +0100, Joe Average wrote:
> > ........ The majority of consumers aren't
> > getting your unofficial patches, but you can be sure the hackers are
> using
> > them, and using them to their advantage.
>
> Yeah hackers are now using the unofficial patch to protect themselves!!!
> nooooooooooooooooo
>
> Niek
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060104/91d6dd56/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists