full-disclosure - RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2be58a30601050413r37944b08j7d856add03f827f8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jan  5 12:14:07 2006
From: infosecbofh at gmail.com (InfoSecBOFH)
Subject: RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification

Steve Gibson is a retard.  Actually, Steve Gibson is less than a
retard.  What kind of so called expert reccomends a third party patch?

Oh wait.. the same expert that bitched about a fantasy sockets issue....


On 1/4/06, Mario Contestabile <marioc@...puter.org> wrote:
> But come on..Steve Gibson's latest "Security Now" podcast claims he has
> 'looked it over, and it looks good' ...
>
> Mario Contestabile
> Developer , RadialPoint
> marioc@...puter.org
> Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/e/fps/3704298/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Shostack [mailto:adam@...eport.org]
> Sent: January 3, 2006 5:37 PM
> To: Gadi Evron
> Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; FunSec
> [List]
> Subject: Re: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:28:40AM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
> | The "patch" by Ilfak Guilfanov works, but by disabling a DLL in Windows.
> | So far no problems have been observed by anyone using this patch. You
>
> This is incorrect.  Michael Hennessy has reported problems on the
> patch-management mailing list:
>
> > I took the SANS advice and de-registered the dll, and also installed
> > Ilfak Guilfanov's "temporary patch" on 1 win2k machine and 6 XP
> > machines today.
> >
> > All fine except for one of the XP machines - wouldn't run IE without
> > gpf'ing until I uninstalled the patch - but leaving the dll
> > de-registered didn't seem to cause any grief anywhere, so far.
> >
> > FWIW, the iexplore crashes left this in the event log:
> >
> > Event ID 4097, source : drwatson The application, C:\Program
> > Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe, generated an application error
> > The error occurred on 01/02/2006 @ 14:49:49.709 The exception
> > generated was c0000005 at address 0068E3BA (<nosymbols>)
> >
> > I suspect that the patch conflicts with an application that is
> > specific to this machine.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=patchmanagement&m=113624877814460&w=2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>