full-disclosure - Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1bde4ec50601050230k32a62319s@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jan  5 11:32:30 2006
From: colweb at gmail.com (Colin)
Subject: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers,
	not security

On 04/01/06, Joe Average <yahooinsider@...il.com> wrote:
> From my blog:
>
> ""[Unofficial patches are available, as is a leaked official patch]
<snip>

Just wanted to point out the public admittance that Joe Average is
actually netdev.

Thought he was banned?

Its just these sort of posts that were the reason he was banned I
thought. More relevant is what Simon Richter mentioned, the fact that
if people get used to installing unofficial patches, they could be
setting up themselves to install something dodgy in the future. People
shouldn't get used to installing unofficial patches.

On 04/01/06, Joe Average <yahooinsider@...il.com> wrote:
> Well done the experts,
>
> You deserve the title after all

Thought you were an "expert" too Joe?

:P