full-disclosure - infosecbofh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c3fa2270601051223y2a0dfba6oaf6c7cfa935a1e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jan  5 20:23:51 2006
From: yahooinsider at gmail.com (Joe Average)
Subject: infosecbofh

Why are you mentioning n3td3v? This thread is about infosecbofh, please keep
on topic. I don't believe the two XSSing vulnerabilities on Google Groups is
all netdev is responsible for. Look closer into whats going on. Theres a
world of conspriacy out there to be had. Lets not argue amoung ourselfs.

The Sober.z variant will be attacking tomorrow and speculation that it'll
have a WMF exploit payload is already sweeping the underground. I think we
should be concentrating on that kind of thing, than arguing on really low
priorty topics like who is more of a disruption than who on a mailing list.

Take care now.


On 1/5/06, Stan Bubrouski <stan.bubrouski@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Oh where to begin...
>
> On 1/5/06, Joe Average <yahooinsider@...il.com> wrote:
> > I guess he got bored of turning netdev into public enemy number one, to
>
> You are n3td3v, and talking in the third person under an assumed
> identity just adds to your own turmoil.
>
> > divert attention away from the real guy who is messing up the list, none
>
> Yep infosecbofh, joe average, n3td3v, etc... are a nuisance, but in
> infosecbofh's defense he seems to be using only one email account to
> torture his victims.
>
> > other than the guy who has never released any security
> vulnerabilities... I
> > present to you...mr infosecbofh...round of applause!
>
> You keep coming back to this but all you ever find is XSS in sites,
> not even in products or such.  I'm not putting down what you do, but
> you act like its so important and that it makes you more important
> even though it doesn't.  Also, its hard to be sympathetic for you
> getting picked on when you *clearly* try to instigate situations at
> every turn, and when n3td3v isn't mentioned in a thread you bring him
> up, and he's you so what can you expect?
>
> Please stop responding to this crap, its no secret you want it to
> continue so your name gets more hits on google, but the rest of us
> could care less about you or problems with everyone who ever
> contradicts you.  Stay in school and shut up.  PLEASE.
>
> Best Regards,
> sb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060105/ed365678/attachment.html