full-disclosure - Re: what we REALLY learned from WMF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <df8ba96d0601060529i33c780f9j@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jan  6 13:29:17 2006
From: c0ntexb at gmail.com (c0ntex)
Subject: Re: what we REALLY learned from WMF

On 06/01/06, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:
> I am just saying that we as an industry got used to False Positives,
> slow responses, etc. We should demand more and this situation proved it
> is possible.

I doubt your "industry" had anything to do with it. Someone running a
cost-out project probably discovered they could save a few 100k by
reducing support requests via call centers and email bandwidth if they
dropped it, and in return got themselves a nice PM / consolidation job
with an office, a view and a parking space..

--

regards
c0ntex