[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060106222549.GP4290@suespammers.org>
Date: Fri Jan 6 22:24:56 2006
From: rodrigob at suespammers.org (Rodrigo Barbosa)
Subject: REWMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:50:39PM -0500, Technica Forensis wrote:
> > >What ARE the real risks (or lack of them) for Win9X/ME systems ?
> I think the risk he is that they are running Win9x/ME.
You are so right. I mean, it is not as if one of my clients had
a US$ 300K HPLC connected to a Win98 computer, with software that will
not run on a newer version of Windows. It makes total send for him
to ditch the HPLC, buy a new one, just so he can upgrade to a new
version of MS pet OS.
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@...spammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDvu5tpdyWzQ5b5ckRApqyAJ4l6RXe44nBH16rCxOaTzTBNcBabgCeNgyu
wu+zCCca8NHqZg0j4nR3RoI=
=Ct1Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists