[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060107165210.GF7167@sivokote.iziade.m$>
Date: Sat Jan 7 16:52:24 2006
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: Open Letter on the Interpretation of
"Vulnerability Statistics"
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 04:59:48PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Georgi Guninski:
>
> > so you approve gaining pseudo credibility by practicing mouse copy/paste?
> >
> > then this pseudo credibility leads to corporate serving/licking like:
> > "responsible disclosure rfc" - search for it.
> >
> > not than coley is consistent at all (besides lacking completeness):
> > http://www.cve.mitre.org/board/archives/2002-02/msg00026.html
> > -------------------
> > - The Board has agreed that CNAs should not reserve candidates for
> > people who do not practice responsible disclosure (candidates would
> > be assigned *after* publication). I hope that this document, or a
> > later version, will become part of the "definition" of responsible
> > disclosure.
> > -------------------
>
> Yes, this puzzles me too, but on the other hand, Debian became a CNA,
> and Debian's official policy is geared away from "responsible
> disclosure" -- all bug reports are supposed to be public.
i am surprised that the debian constitution allows participation in such
shady organizations.
the open source crowd can easily setup a cross open vendor database and the
first one of the eleet them to learn of a bug to paste with the mouse.
but for strange reasons vendor-sec@....de seems to like mitre.
--
where do you want bill gates to go today?
<end_of_message>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists