full-disclosure - Penetration Testing : A Third Party Hacker.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <591fd0b20601100526q4886eba8w38721717cea20dbf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue Jan 10 13:26:56 2006
From: stacksmasher at gmail.com (Stack Smasher)
Subject: Penetration Testing : A Third Party Hacker.

Any system is only as good as the person who built it. I am a firm
believer in bringing in 3rd parties to pen test. I have too often seen
someone in a position due to who they know and not what they know.
When you bring in that third party who is a professional pen tester
you find gaps in an administrators knowledge.

On 1/9/06, 6ackpace <6ackpace@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have read an artical on SANS website.I have some questions unanswered.
>
>
> External Penetration Testing conducted by third party.
>
> How efficient it is?After all he will go through all the step of penetration
> testing (internal PT).
> How safe is integrity of Organization information for which PT is performed?
> Difference between External and Internal PT'ers.
>
>              External-Internal = Approach+Skill
> Levels+Commitment+Trustworthiness.
>
> Thank You,
> 6ackpace
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

--
"If you see me laughing, you better have backups"