full-disclosure - Re: [ GLSA 200601-09 ]Wine:Windows MetafileSETABORTPROC vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43FB1967D03EC7449A77FA91322E3648144079@SVL1XCHCLUPIN02.enterprise.veritas.com>
Date: Sun Jan 15 22:47:27 2006
From: pferrie at symantec.com (Peter Ferrie)
Subject: Re: [ GLSA 200601-09
	]Wine:Windows	MetafileSETABORTPROC vulnerability

>>It's insecure-by-design, but it's working exactly as written.
>>It's been in there for _15_ years, and ported to every version of Windows.
>>Windows 3.0 supports it. :-/
>
>I'm still having a bit of trouble following Gibson's explanation of how the
>WMF flaw works, but it's my impression he says it does *not* operate
>according to spec. And yet Wine is vulnerable. Am I wrong?

Steve is wrong.  Wine was (I believe that a patch was released) vulnerable
because the function was documented exactly as it behaves, and they coded to that.
 
8^) p.